|
|
Post by blackest_knight on Nov 27, 2008 17:13:03 GMT -5
I have to say, I'm surprised no one got mad at me for my review of Twilight on The List |
|
|
|
Post by Angry Sandwich on Nov 29, 2008 13:52:30 GMT -5
You just have the guts to say what everyone else was thinking. Of course, now the thought police are going to rape your mind, but don't worry, I hear their new inquisitor isn't nearly as good as the old one. The other guy could keep you alive for yeeeaaarrrrssss. With the new guy you'll probably be dead within a month or two.
Oh, and I gave it some thought about Twilight being heavily influenced by WW, and I don't think that is entirely fair. The variety of disciplines and clans are suppose to embody the various archtypical vampires in modern and ancient myth. Basically, WW got most of its influence from pop and ancient culture, so anyone else who decides to take notes from those same sources would appear to be copying WW. Instead, WW just kinda showed up first and put its fingers in most of the pies.
|
|
|
|
Post by blackest_knight on Nov 29, 2008 16:09:23 GMT -5
Yes, that is true. Yes, there were things that were different (ie diamond skin in the sunlight?)but it seemed a little too coincidental (ie the crazy seerer vampire) for my liking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angry Sandwich on Nov 29, 2008 18:26:44 GMT -5
Bah! What do you know? Not like you work with books all . . . . I mean not like you read alot. . ..
You win this round.
|
|
